Grey Matter Partners
A structured read on how safe your team actually is.
This is a structured read on the interpersonal climate of your team, grounded in thirty years of psychological safety research (Amy Edmondson and colleagues; Google Project Aristotle). It measures four team-climate dimensions (voice, learning exposure, inclusion, challenger safety) plus a fifth dimension on how senior-person behavior on the team creates or erodes safety.
The goal is to give you a clear read on the climate of your team: whether people can actually speak up, whether mistakes are treated as learning, whether different perspectives are heard, whether it is safe to push back on senior decisions, and the senior-person behavior that shapes all of it. A clearer view of where your team sits is what you need to protect what is working and change what is not. This is a self-report, which means it reads the climate as you experience it, not the climate as the full team would report. Your responses are yours. We store them to generate your report and improve aggregate benchmarks. We do not sell your data and we do not share individual responses.
A scored report across five dimensions, a written interpretation specific to your answers, three findings grounded in the items and your open-ended responses, and one question worth sitting with.
Grounded in published research. Calibrated by context.
- A few details about you and the team: your role, industry, team size, your relationship to the team (leader or member), tenure. Initials are fine if you prefer anonymity.
- The assessment itself: 17 short statements about how the team operates, answered on a five-point scale.
- Three short written reflections. The behavioral observations and self-witness questions the numbers cannot capture.
About 10 minutes. Complete in one sitting.